A True "Two Witnesses" [Reformer/PIMI] Speaks Out ... About The New "Blood" Policy Issue!

Important Board Announcements & Key Scriptural Articles found here. Only LWF Administration post here.

Moderators: Sprout (Zech. 6:12), LWF Administration

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
WiseButPoorOldMan (Ecclesiastes 9:13-16)
YORWW CONGREGATION MODERN DAY SERVANT
YORWW CONGREGATION MODERN DAY SERVANT
Posts: 448
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 5:19 pm
Location: Founder YORWW Bible Institute & Training Center resides YORWW World Headquarters Jamaica, W.I.
Contact:

A True "Two Witnesses" [Reformer/PIMI] Speaks Out ... About The New "Blood" Policy Issue!

#1 Post by WiseButPoorOldMan (Ecclesiastes 9:13-16) » Tue Mar 24, 2026 9:26 am

**
A True "Two Witnesses" [Reformer/PIMI] Speaks Out ...
About The New "Blood" Policy Issue
!

("A [Serious] Message For An Elder ..." See: Isaiah 66:6; Zechariah 12:3-6; Revelation 11:3)


Zechariah 12:3-6

3 It will come about on that day that I will make Jerusalem a heavy stone for all the peoples; all who lift it will injure themselves severely. And all the nations of the earth will be gathered against it. 4 On that day,” declares the Lord, “I will strike every horse with confusion and its rider with insanity. But I will watch over the house of Judah, while I strike every horse of the peoples with blindness. 5 Then the clans of Judah will say in their hearts, ‘The inhabitants of Jerusalem are a strong support for us through the Lord of armies, their God.’

6 “On that day I will make the clans of Judah [Reformer Elders -- Rev 11:3] like a firepot among pieces of wood and a flaming torch among sheaves, so they will consume on the right and on the left all the surrounding peoples, while the inhabitants of Jerusalem again live on their own sites in Jerusalem.


Zechariah 12:5 shows us plainly, the JW Elders ["Clans of Judah"] are unexpectedly, being infused with courage and bravery from the example of the "Inhabitants of Jerusalem" ... yes, these ordinary, rank and file, basic "grassroots" JW individuals in the congregation. Yes, individuals who are surprisingly, not pleased with recent events and activities of the Governing Body. Yes, ordinary Jehovah's Witnesses, who are NOT ... NOT afraid to speak out about Governing Body "clarifications" of recent about the use of Blood. Yes, these JWs, are not afraid to voice public dissent about the new "clarification" on "Blood" from the Governing Body of recent ... their recent "Blood" Policy Decisions. No, these ones are not afraid, of these "Lawless" leading ones at "Bethel" Headquarters in Warwick, NY. And now, they are even voicing their concerns openly, about this appalling situation, in the congregation before all onlookers.

And additionally, they are letting the [fearful, cowardly] Elders, the "Clans of Judah" ... know [to their faces] ... about it. Yes, they now openly, publicly OPPOSE the Governing Body, thus creating ... "Uproar at the Temple" [Isaiah 66:6] over this heinous, despicable, and unholy matter. The Elders must know, what they think of this New Light, this New "Clarification" ... this horrible New "Blood" Policy of the Governing Body, which automatically makes them, the Governing Body, "BLOOD GUILTY" before Jehovah & Jesus Christ, the Head of the Christian Congregation ... since so many faithful brothers & sisters, faithful Jehovah's Witnesses, have actually died ... died ... because of their failure in critical judgment, of these most serious matters. -- See Numbers 35:33-34; Matthew 5:19; James 3:1; 1st John 3:15; 2nd Thessalonians 2:3-12.

See JW comments below:

****A sincere Jehovah's Witnesses expresses heartfelt, deep sentiments about New Blood Policy By the Governing Body*****

message for elder


See link to post: https://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/ ... sage-elder

by M.and 19 hours ago 0 Replies latest 19 hours ago watchtower scandals

M.and
M.and
19 hours ago

I sent a text message to many elders and no one responded, did you do it?

I am writing to you also on this point with great seriousness, because it is not just a matter of theology, but of responsibility before God and before real lives.

You speak to me of trust and integrity, but in light of what I have read and what was taught in the past, I must tell you that the behavior of the elders, and of the Governing Body in general, seems to me to be extremely lacking in true responsibility.

When a human interpretation of blood is used to impose a rigid discipline that leads people to refuse transfusions even in situations of serious risk to life, you are playing with people's lives, not just their consciences.

And if today you admit that pre-depositing one's own blood is a matter of conscience, why was it presented yesterday as "contrary to God's law"?

If the change is so drastic, then that rigid line did not come from God, but from an organization that used God's name to impose human decisions, with serious consequences.

I am thinking in particular of the children who appeared on the cover of Awake! dated May 22, 1994, with those smiles, those eyes full of hope, while the magazine spoke of a better future under the new system, as if they were images of a protected life.

One of those children, for a concrete example, was named Adrian Yeatt on the cover of that Awake!, had to choose between his own life and the pressure of a line that had been presented to him as "God's will," and in the end he lost his life because he did not dare to go against what he had been taught. His story is not just a statistic: it is your responsibility because you would have advised, approved, and pushed a child to death—for what?

For something that is now a matter of conscience.

For this reason, I ask you a direct question, but with an open heart:

If you, as someone who follows and supports the Governing Body, truly feel consistent with God, how can you feel at peace knowing that the same line you defended and spread in the past was taught so rigidly that it led children, young people, and adults to refuse to save their lives, while today it is said that certain practices are a matter of conscience?

If those children, perhaps the very one from the cover of Awake! 1994, were here today and asked you:

"And you, who taught us that we must never touch blood, do you feel responsible for the fate that became ours?",
what would you answer?

I am not attacking you personally, but I ask you to face reality:

When God's Word is used to turn human decisions into dogmas, and when those dogmas concern life and death, the responsibility is enormous.

If God does not change, but the "lines" change so much, then those who teach should recognize their own error, not just continue as if nothing had changed.

I, before God Jehovah, can no longer pretend nothing happened. When I see blood used to save lives, and then hear it said that accepting it is "sin," and after years hear that even pre-depositing one's own blood is a matter of conscience, I see man, not God. And you, who support and reinforce the Governing Body's line, do you truly feel at peace with Jehovah if you do not ask yourself whether those rigidities contributed to the suffering and death of people who simply trusted you?

I ask you to pray sincerely, but also to look straight in the eyes, very seriously, at the responsibility of those who teach.

And finally, I tell you this: you and the Governing Body will be judged by God for what you do, for how you use His name, for how you have treated people's consciences, and for how you have presented as His will what was then changed, corrected, and made a matter of conscience.

If you truly feel at peace with Him, then you should feel sincere shame for how people's blood was used as a banner of "integrity," while that same line is now being dismantled from within.

***
"He that is from God listens to the sayings of God..." -- John 8:47

Post Reply

Return to “Forum 1: LivingWatersForum Board Announcements & Key Scriptural Articles”